北大法宝推出“法宝双语案例”栏目。本栏目选取近期热门司法案例进行双语发布，每两周一期，欢迎关注！感谢新老朋友对北大法宝的大力支持，我们会持续为大家提供更好的法律信息服务。本周推送第一百二十三期，主要关注涉生命权纠纷案例！
本期双语案例推送张荣生等诉上海康仁乐购超市贸易有限公司生命权纠纷案等涉生命权纠纷案例。
目录
Contents
1. 张荣生等诉上海康仁乐购超市贸易有限公司生命权纠纷案
Zhang Rongsheng et al. v. Shanghai Kangren Tesco Supermarket Trade Co., Ltd. (case of dispute over right to life)
2. 陈帮容、陈国荣、陈曦诉陈静、吴建平、李跃国、周富勇生命权纠纷案
Chen Bangrong, Chen Guorong, and Chen Xi v. Chen Jing, Wu Jianping, Li Yueguo, and Zhou Fuyong (case of dispute over right to life)
3. 蒋海燕、曾英诉覃维邱、苏燕弟生命权纠纷案
Jiang Haiyan and Zeng Ying v. Qin Weiqiu and Su Yandi (case of dispute over right to life)
一、张荣生等诉上海康仁乐购超市贸易有限公司生命权纠纷案
Zhang Rongsheng et al. v. Shanghai Kangren Tesco Supermarket Trade Co., Ltd. (case of dispute over right to life)
【裁判摘要】
公共场所管理人的安全保障义务应界定在合理范围内，应当保证场所及相关配套设施符合安全标准，排除安全隐患，同时应当及时对已发生的危险和损害采取积极的应对和救助措施。管理人是否尽到必要的救助义务，应参照社会普遍认同的衡量标准加以判断。
[Judgment Abstract]
The duty of safety protection of the manager of a public venue shall be defined within a reasonable range. The manager shall ensure that the venue and the relevant ancillary facilities meet the safety standards, potential safety dangers be eliminated, and active response be made and rescue measures be taken against dangers and harm that have occurred in a timely manner. Whether a manager has fulfilled the duty of necessary rescue shall be judged with reference to the standards widely accepted by the general public.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.325584805
[CLI Code] CLI.C.325584805 (EN)
二、陈帮容、陈国荣、陈曦诉陈静、吴建平、李跃国、周富勇生命权纠纷案
Chen Bangrong, Chen Guorong, and Chen Xi v. Chen Jing, Wu Jianping, Li Yueguo, and Zhou Fuyong (case of dispute over right to life)
【裁判摘要】
债权人采取合理限度的自助行为以防止债务人再次隐匿逃债，并与债务人商定一同前往人民法院解决债务纠纷，在此期间，债务人在自身安全未受到现实威胁的情况下，为继续逃避法定债务，自行翻窗逃跑致死的，债权人不承担法律责任。
[Judgment Abstract]
Where the creditor takes reasonable self-help action to prevent the debtor from hiding himself or herself for debt evasion again, and both parties agree to go to the people's court for resolution of the debt dispute, if, during this period, under the circumstances that the debtor's personal safety is not under threat, in order to continue to evade the statutory debts, the debtor flees by crossing the window but falls dead, the creditor shouldn’t be held legally liable.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.84184885
[CLI Code] CLI.C.84184885 (EN)
三、蒋海燕、曾英诉覃维邱、苏燕弟生命权纠纷案
Jiang Haiyan and Zeng Ying v. Qin Weiqiu and Su Yandi (case of dispute over right to life)
【裁判摘要】
民法鼓励民事主体积极开展合法、正当的社会交往。行为人在正常社会交往活动中实施的行为本身不具有危害性，因意外因素造成他人的权益受到损害的，如果行为人无过错，且其行为与损害结果之间无任何因果关系，行为人依法不承担赔偿责任。
[Judgment Abstract]
The Civil Law encourages civil subjects to actively conduct legitimate and proper social interaction. Where an actor whose act conducted in a normal social interaction activity is not harmful but causes harm to others' rights and interests due to an accidental factor, if he/she is not at fault, and there is no causal relationship between his/her act and the harm, he/she shall not undertake compensation liability according to law.
|
