北大法宝推出“法宝双语案例”栏目。本栏目选取近期热门司法案例进行双语发布，每两周一期，欢迎关注！感谢新老朋友对北大法宝的大力支持，我们会持续为大家提供更好的法律信息服务。本周推送第一百三十六期，主要关注涉侵权责任纠纷案例！
本期双语案例推送田昀旦与浙江淘宝网络有限公司等产品责任纠纷上诉案等涉侵权责任纠纷案例。
目录
Contents
1.田昀旦与浙江淘宝网络有限公司等产品责任纠纷上诉案
Tian Yundan v. Zhejiang Taobao Network Co., Ltd., et al. (appeal case regarding dispute over product liability)
2.季明洁等与丁奕晗教育机构责任纠纷上诉案
Ji Mingjie, et al. v. Ding Yihan (appeal case regarding dispute over liability of an educational institution)
3.杨某诉北京市八大处均胜投资管理公司侵权责任纠纷案
Yang v. Beijing Badachu Junsheng Investment Management Company (case regarding dispute over tort liability)
一、田昀旦与浙江淘宝网络有限公司等产品责任纠纷上诉案
Tian Yundan v. Zhejiang Taobao Network Co., Ltd., et al. (appeal case regarding dispute over product liability)
【裁判摘要】
根据法律规定，电子商务平台经营者知道或应当知道平台内经营者销售的商品或提供的服务侵害消费者合法权益时，应当采取必要措施，否则应与平台内经营者承担连带责任。实践中消费者未对电子商务平台经营者未尽管理责任提交证据且在其受到产品侵害后电子商务平台经营者对缺陷产品进行了下架处理，故平台经营者不必承担连带赔偿责任。
[Judgment Abstract]
Pursuant to relevant legal provisions, if an e-commerce platform operator knows or should have known that any commodity or service sold and provided by the business operators on the platform infringes upon the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, it should take necessary actions, or it should be jointly and severally liable with the operators. In judicial practice, where the consumer fails to submit any proof that the e-commerce platform operator fails to fulfill its management duties and has removed the defective products from the platform after the consumer suffers from the infringement of the products, the platform operator is not be jointly and severally liable for the compensation.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.507345668
[CLI Code] CLI.C.507345668(EN)
二、季明洁等与丁奕晗教育机构责任纠纷上诉案
Ji Mingjie, et al. v. Ding Yihan (appeal case regarding dispute over liability of an educational institution)
【裁判摘要】
无民事行为能力人在教育机构学习期间，教育机构未尽到教育、管理和保护职责，并且其规定的管理措施致使监护人客观上无法实际履行监护职责的情况下，无民事行为能力人出于善意实施帮助行为致人损害的，其主观上不具有过错，该行为亦不具有违法性，因此，对于受害人的人身损害应当由教育机构承担赔偿责任，受害人的监护人主张由实施善意帮助行为人及其监护人承担赔偿责任的，人民法院不予支持。
[Judgment Abstract]
Where during the study in an educational institution, a person without capacity for civil conduct causes damage to another person by offering kind help, if the educational institution fails to fulfill its duties of education, management and protection and its management measures render it impossible for the guardian to fulfill the duty of guardianship, the person without capacity for civil conduct isn't deemed at fault subjectively, nor should his act of offering help be considered illegal. Therefore, the compensation liability for the personal damage of the victim should be assumed by the educational institution, and if the guardian of the victim claims the person offering the kind help and his guardian should be jointly liable for the compensation, the people's court shouldn't support it.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.316577217
[CLI Code] CLI.C.316577217(EN)
三、杨某诉北京市八大处均胜投资管理公司侵权责任纠纷案
Yang v. Beijing Badachu Junsheng Investment Management Company (case regarding dispute over tort liability)
【裁判摘要】
《民法典》第一千二百五十二条规定了构筑物塌陷致害责任，因构筑物的所有人、管理人、使用人的原因，构筑物塌陷造成他人损害的，管理人等应直接承担责任。管理人未能证明已对构筑物尽到修缮、维护等管理义务，构筑物发生倒塌、塌陷致人损害的，认定其对损害后果存在过错，该过错与损害后果之间存在因果关系，管理人等应当承担与过错相应的赔偿责任。
[Judgment Abstract]
According to Article 1252 of the Civil Code, where a structure collapses or subsides and causes damage to another person, the owner, the manager, and the user of the structure shall directly assume the liability if the damage is attributed to their fault. Where the manager fails to prove that he has fulfilled his obligations of structure management such as repair and maintenance, if the structure collapses or subsides, causing damage to another person, it's deemed that the manager is at fault for the consequences of the damage. Since there is a causality between the fault and the consequences of the damage, the manager and other relevant persons should be liable for the compensation in proportion to their respective faults.
|
